“Disease claim in blog / SEO content”

High Implied claim 1 of 98 standards

What this standard rests on

FDA · US · statute

FDCA s.201(m), 21 U.S.C. 321(m)

“'labeling' includes matter accompanying the article, which FDA has applied to brand websites and other owned content”

FDA · US · statute

FDCA s.201(g)(1)(B), 21 U.S.C. 321(g)(1)(B)

“definition of 'drug': articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease”

Source checked 2026-08-18.

FTC · US · statute

FTC Act s.5(a), 15 U.S.C. 45(a)

“unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce”

Source checked 2026-08-18.

What kind of finding this is

An interpretation. We applied a published legal test to the published copy and reached a conclusion. Reasonable reviewers applying the same test can disagree at the margin; this is our reviewer's professional opinion, and the test is cited so you can check the reasoning.

Cite this standard

Claims Verified, standard CV-IC-06 "Disease claim in blog / SEO content", standards v1.3.1, retrieved 16 September 2026, https://claimsverified.org/standards/CV-IC-06/

Or put it in your own policy

Marketing copy must not use "Disease claim in blog / SEO content" or equivalent wording. See Claims Verified standard CV-IC-06 (standards v1.3.1): https://claimsverified.org/standards/CV-IC-06/

Cite it freely with attribution and the version. The whole register is machine-readable at /standards/registry.json. Rulings are our published professional opinion, not legal advice.

Others in Implied claim

CV-IC-01 · Testimonial naming a disease CV-IC-02 · Product name implying treatment CV-IC-03 · Ingredient study on a disease population CV-IC-04 · Affiliate/influencer disease claim CV-IC-05 · Undisclosed material connection CV-IC-07 · Disease claim in email flows

All 98 standards and the 98 in force · Check a listing against them free