Proof on demand

Every gatekeeper asks the same question. Says who?

A licensed pharmacist, by name, with a licence number anyone can check on the public register.

Wherever your revenue has a gatekeeper, someone asks who reviewed your claims. The audit produces one signed claims file that answers all of them.

We hold no relationship with your agency, your counsel or your retailer, and we sell you nothing else. Nothing in the file is written to protect anyone. The file is statute-cited, dated under versioned standards, and built to be forwarded as-is.

Who asksSame question
  • Amazon appeals
  • Ad-account reviews
  • Processor underwriting
  • Retail diligence
One signed file answers every one of them.

The gatekeepers

Eight gatekeepers, one exhibit.

1

Amazon appeals

The gatekeeper asks

Why should this suppressed listing be reinstated?

You present

The findings file for the flagged claim: ruled, rewritten, and signed, evidence the copy now on the page was professionally reviewed.

Your appeal attaches the signed findings for the exact claim Amazon flagged, documentation, not a promise to do better.

2

Meta & Google ad review

The gatekeeper asks

Why should this restricted account run health-adjacent creative?

You present

The audit’s ad-copy section: every live claim held to permitted structure-function language.

Structure-function language is what the law lets a supplement say, what a product supports, never what it treats or cures. Your ads are held to it line by line.

3

Payment processors

The gatekeeper asks

Is this merchant’s claims language an underwriting risk?

You present

A dated, third-party review of every public claim, on hand for the underwriting file rather than assembled after a payout review starts.

Underwriting just means the processor deciding how risky your account is to bank. The file gives their reviewer a third-party answer instead of your word for it.

4

Retail buyers

The gatekeeper asks

Can we put this brand on shelf without inheriting its copy?

You present

The signed file and its dated changelog, the claims-compliance section of the buyer’s onboarding packet, ready on day one.

The changelog lists each claim that changed and the date it changed, the paper trail a buyer’s compliance reviewer wants on file.

5

Acquirers & brokers

The gatekeeper asks

What claims liability transfers at closing?

You present

The exhibit our diligence tier produces: exposure as a percentile, fixes priced, deal-room ready.

Exposure as a percentile means your brand is scored against every brand in its category, so a buyer sees where you stand among peers, not just a raw count of findings.

6

Insurance underwriters

The gatekeeper asks

What’s the claims exposure on this book?

You present

The severity-rated findings file and dated changelog: your claims exposure documented, dated and signed.

E&O and product-liability underwriting prices on documented risk. The file is documentation you can produce. What an underwriter does with it is theirs to decide.

7

Plaintiffs’ law firms

The gatekeeper asks

Which claims can we sue on? They ask it by mining listings, not by writing to you.

You get

The same sweep they run, before they run it, with the flagged phrases rewritten out.

Plaintiff firms pick targets by reading listings, which is the same phrase-level read your audit runs.

8

Health Canada

The gatekeeper asks

Does the marketing match the licence?

You present

For Canadian brands, your NPN verified live against Health Canada’s register, with any claim that drifts past the licensed use flagged as a finding.

Every Canadian natural health product needs a licence number (NPN) on the label, and marketing that drifts past the licensed claims is a finding.

The signed file

Built to be forwarded.

Most compliance work dies in a drawer because it was written for the brand that bought it. This file is written for the reviewer who reads it: findings quoted verbatim, statutes cited, severity rated, signature on the last page.

When a gatekeeper asks “says who?”, the file answers with a name: a licensed pharmacist, on a stated date, against 98 published standards drawn from FDA, FTC, Health Canada and marketplace policy.

Every copy of the file carries

  • Every claim quoted verbatim from your live copy
  • The statute or policy each finding breaches
  • Severity rating and the compliant rewrite
  • Standards version and review date
  • The reviewer of record’s signature, a licensed pharmacist. Swept by machine, ruled and signed by a person.
  • Your public verification URL once you pass and license the certification mark, live the day the directory opens
claimsverified.org/verify/your-brandSample
Your BrandLicence active, under monitoring
Audit passedOn record
StandardsVersioned
Last re-scanDated
SealLicensed

The public record

Proof anyone can check.

Pass the audit and license the certification mark, and your brand gets a public verification page: licence status, audit date, standards version, monitoring state. The seal on your label points here, and so can you, when a buyer, a processor or a shopper asks who checked.

Verification pages go live together the day the public directory opens. Your licence is confirmed in writing the day you pass, and charter licence pricing freezes then too.

Request

Have the answer before the question comes.

$2,000 flat, five business days, and the file is yours to present wherever your revenue has a gatekeeper.