Sample report, nothing held back
A complete audit report, start to finish, on a real listing from our scan database. The brand is redacted because we never name a failing brand publicly. Everything else is exactly what a client receives: every failing claim quoted from their own copy, the rule it breaks, and the rewrite that replaces it.
The Critical finding is disease-claim class: a named condition in the bullets, the category Amazon's supplements policy prohibits outright and FDA warning letters cite. Every one of the 7 findings comes with its fix, a compliant line to paste or a single action, so fixing it is an afternoon, not a rewrite of the listing. No payment-processor findings: this is an Amazon listing, and those standards read checkout, trial and review copy on a brand's own site.
“Make disease claims or implied disease claims, unless the FDA approved the statement. Disease claims include claims to diagnose, cure, reduce, treat, or prevent a disease in humans”
“articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals”
“(g)(2)(i) has an effect on a specific disease or class of diseases ... (x) otherwise suggests an effect on a disease or diseases”
“articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals”
“(g)(2)(i) has an effect on a specific disease or class of diseases ... (x) otherwise suggests an effect on a disease or diseases”
“articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals”
“(g)(2)(i) has an effect on a specific disease or class of diseases ... (x) otherwise suggests an effect on a disease or diseases”
“articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals”
“(g)(2)(i) has an effect on a specific disease or class of diseases ... (x) otherwise suggests an effect on a disease or diseases”
“articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals”
“(g)(2)(i) has an effect on a specific disease or class of diseases ... (x) otherwise suggests an effect on a disease or diseases”
“Unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful.”
“Before disseminating an ad, advertisers must have adequate substantiation for all objective product claims conveyed, expressly or by implication. ... As a general matter, substantiation of health-related benefits will need to be in the form of randomized, controlled human clinical testing to meet the competent and reliable scientific standard.”
“Include "Non-genetically modified organism (GMO)" claims without providing documentation using one of the following options: Product-level certification ... Lab test results ... US Department of Agriculture (USDA) organic certification”
“Unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful.”
“Before disseminating an ad, advertisers must have adequate substantiation for all objective product claims conveyed, expressly or by implication. ... As a general matter, substantiation of health-related benefits will need to be in the form of randomized, controlled human clinical testing to meet the competent and reliable scientific standard.”
“Make sure all product labels and descriptions are clear, accurate, truthful, and not misleading. Include all appropriate disclaimers, disclosures, and warranties, and support any claims you make with adequate substantiation.”
“All advertising claims and representations must be supported by competent and reliable evidence, which the advertiser will disclose to Ad Standards upon its request.”
Paste the rewrite for the adrenal-fatigue line first. It is the finding Amazon's published policy prohibits outright.
Swap the implied-drug language ("regulate", "balance", "boosting"), and drop the results promise. Confirm the Non-GMO documentation is on file with Amazon, or remove the claim.
Send us the live listing. We re-scan the same surfaces, and a pass on the re-scan qualifies you for the Mark.
Taking claims away is half the job. These are compliant claims from our standards for this product's benefit areas, at full strength: the ceiling of what the listing can say, not a watered-down version.
Your website, ad copy, email flows, SEO copy, label and influencer briefs, ruled the same way. This sample covers one Amazon listing.
The answers shoppers get when they ask ChatGPT through Amazon's Rufus about your brand, on record.
US: your listing’s amounts and your label’s printed claims, against your own label on file with the NIH. Canada: your copy against the purpose Health Canada approved for your licence. This brand has no label on file with the NIH; about 43% of the brands we scan do, and the report says so either way.
A licensed pharmacist's name, licence and date on the verdict. The one thing software cannot supply.
Every delivered report closes with this block, signed. On a sample it stays unsigned: no client file, no signature.
A passing report
One listing in four we have ruled comes back clean or close to it.
That document is the point. It is what you produce when a retail buyer, an ad reviewer or a payment processor asks whether anyone has checked, and it is what lets you carry the Claims Verified seal, at the launch price, locked in the day you pass.
✓A passing report is shorter
Your own listing
Every surface you publish, ruled by our AI and signed by a licensed pharmacist.
Review of marketing language only, not product testing, formulation, facility compliance, or legal advice. Findings are our professional opinion under the published Claims Verified standards, based on listing copy as captured on the scan date.