Claim rulingsSubstantiation
Not without evidence. “Non-habit forming” is a safety claim that has to be documented, so remove it unless you hold the documentation.
Why it fails
A safety claim requiring evidence.
We file this under substantiation and rate it medium. It is enforced by FDA, FTC, which matters because a single phrase can fail in more than one place at once: a listing suppression, an ad-account review and a warning letter are three different consequences of the same sentence.
What to say instead
This is the rewrite an audit ships for this phrase, in the words we would hand you.
The ruling’s own rewrite
Remove unless documented.
Every structure/function claim on this page still needs the FDA disclaimer wherever it appears. That requirement has its own ruling.
Run one ASIN through the free check. You get the severity counts on your own copy, ruled against all 98 standards, with no sales call attached.
Nearby rulings
Cite usThis ruling is free to quote. Credit “Claims Verified” and link here. It is regulatory review of marketing language, not legal advice.
audit@claimsverified.org →