No. Preventing a disease is a drug claim, so a dietary supplement cannot say it prevents any named condition; the compliant construction is “supports” plus a normal body function.
Disease prevention is a drug claim.
We file this under disease verb and rate it critical. It is enforced by FDA, FTC, Amazon, Meta, Google, which matters because a single phrase can fail in more than one place at once: a listing suppression, an ad-account review and a warning letter are three different consequences of the same sentence.
This is the rewrite an audit ships for this phrase, in the words we would hand you.
'Supports [normal function]' - never prevention of a named condition.
Maintenance framing is the safest construction.
Normal function.
Broad structure/function.
Normal structure.
Every structure/function claim on this page still needs the FDA disclaimer wherever it appears. That requirement has its own ruling.
Run one ASIN through the free check. You get the severity counts on your own copy, ruled against all 81 standards, with no sales call attached.