CV-SB-01 · standards v1.4.1

“#1 doctor recommended”

High Substantiation 1 of 109 standards

How often we find it

Found on 171 of the 2,243 best-selling listings we have ruled, 189 times in total. That is 171 live product pages carrying this wording today.

What this standard rests on

FTC · US · statute

FTC Act s.5(a), 15 U.S.C. 45(a)

“unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce”

Source checked 2026-08-18.

FTC · US · guidance

FTC Health Products Compliance Guidance (December 2022)

“health-benefit claims generally require randomised, controlled human clinical testing; this is the document Walmart's substantiation checklist is asking about”

Source checked 2026-08-18.

FTC · US · regulation

16 CFR 255.1

“advertisers are liable for claims made through endorsements, including claims they could not make directly”

Source checked 2026-08-18.

Walmart · retailer · supply contract

Walmart Standards for Suppliers, Label and Market Products Accurately

“suppliers must support any claim they make with adequate substantiation”

Source checked 2026-08-18.

Ad Standards Canada · CA · self-regulatory code

Canadian Code of Advertising Standards, clause 1(e)

“claims must be supported by competent and reliable evidence, disclosed to Ad Standards on request”

Source checked 2026-08-18.

What kind of finding this is

Not a ruling. The claim may be permissible in this form, but only if the brand holds evidence meeting the cited standard. We do not hold or evaluate that evidence. Answer it in column (b).

Cite this standard

Claims Verified, standard CV-SB-01 "#1 doctor recommended", standards v1.4.1, retrieved 06 November 2026, https://claimsverified.org/standards/CV-SB-01/

Or put it in your own policy

Marketing copy must not use "#1 doctor recommended" or equivalent wording. See Claims Verified standard CV-SB-01 (standards v1.4.1): https://claimsverified.org/standards/CV-SB-01/

Cite it freely with attribution and the version. The whole register is machine-readable at /standards/registry.json. Rulings are our published professional opinion, not legal advice.

All 109 standards and the 109 in force · Check a listing against them free

Claims Verified

The independent standard for supplement and telehealth claims. Our AI rules a brand’s public supplement claims against 109 published standards. Each failing line is rewritten to the rules. A licensed pharmacist signs every Claims Review Report.

audit@claimsverified.org
Toronto · 1200 Bay St, Suite 1201
New York · 228 Park Ave S, NY 10003
Services How it works Free listing check Listing and Launch Clean Monitoring Listing Rescue and appeals Warning-letter response Telehealth: FDA Letter Match M&A diligence Proof on demand Request an audit Book a call
Research Research and data Claims by category Claim rulings Enforcement tracker Enforcement wire Telehealth letter index Daily record
Check our work Standards and method Sample report Corrections What this does not tell you How to verify us Our AI agents and their limits
Company About us Verify a signed file Partner program Client login Common questions Contact
© 2026 Claims Verified Privacy Terms Unsubscribe Every Claims Review Report signed by a licensed pharmacist Published from Toronto · 109 current standards · every figure recomputed from the scan databases before each deploy