Every customer on your catalogue sells an identical formulation. What differs between them is the copy, which means every bit of the regulatory risk sits in the one thing you do not control and they are least equipped to get right.
The FDA and the FTC pursue whoever markets the product. Your customer is a marketer who bought a finished good, not a formulator and not a regulatory professional, and the exposure is entirely theirs.
A customer whose listing is suppressed or who receives a warning letter stops reordering. You did not write the copy and it still lands on your retention number.
Catalogue descriptions get pasted into a hundred storefronts. One phrase that fails a standard is not one problem, it is a hundred, all carrying your product.
One formulation, one COA, one clean specification.
A marketer with no regulatory function decides what the product treats.
A hundred different claim sets on an identical capsule.
They carry the liability. You carry the lost reorder.
We do not add a step. We rule the one link nobody currently reads, and sign it so it can be handed on.
We rule a base SKU against all 81 standards and write the compliant copy for it. Every label owner selling that SKU can use it. The audit is priced per brand; this is priced per SKU, which is the only version of this that scales with your catalogue instead of your customer count.
A seller doing $8,000 a month cannot buy a $2,000 audit and can buy a launch claims check at $450. Once a SKU is ruled, the marginal cost of the next customer is close to nothing, so the price can sit where their budget is.
Take a share, or resell it under your own name at your margin. Fee is identical whether a brand passes or fails, and no commission touches the certification mark, ever. An incentive to find problems would make the finding worthless to you.
The same file every time, whatever route it arrives by.
Every public claim ruled against all 81 standards, drawn from published FDA, FTC and marketplace rules.
Each finding quoted verbatim from the copy, with the standard it runs into.
A compliant rewrite for every finding, written to keep the sales promise.
Severity rating, so the takedown triggers get fixed before the wording nits.
Where the brand sits against the 1,115 listings we have ruled, which is the one number nobody else can produce.
A licensed pharmacist signature, by name, on a file built to be forwarded.
Charge differently for a pass. The fee is identical whether a brand passes or fails. An incentive to find problems would make every finding worth less, including to you.
Pay a commission on the mark. No referral path leads to the certification mark, ever. It is earned by audit or not at all.
Contact your book. Non-circumvention and roster confidentiality go in the agreement before any client-level detail moves in either direction.
Call it legal advice. It is a marketing-claims review under a published rubric, signed by a licensed pharmacist. Where a brand needs counsel we say so and refer up.
Pick any product in your catalogue and we will rule its published description and send back every finding with a compliant rewrite, at no charge. If the copy is clean it takes ten minutes to find out.
Or write to audit@claimsverified.org directly. Terms are in writing before the first referral, in either direction.
The evidence behind all of this is public. The State of Supplement Claims runs the full dataset, the ten phrases that fail most, and the method, free to cite with attribution.
Read The State of Supplement Claims →